翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Calculate Linux
・ Calculated
・ Calculated Carbon Aromaticity Index
・ Calculated Ignition Index
・ Calculated Industries
・ Calculated Match Average
・ Calculated Risk
・ Calculated Risk (novel)
・ Calculating demand forecast accuracy
・ Calculating God
・ Calculating Infinity
・ Calculating Space
・ Calculating Visions
・ Calculation
・ Calculation (card game)
Calculation in kind
・ Calculation of buoyancy flows and flows inside buildings
・ Calculation of glass properties
・ Calculation of radiocarbon dates
・ Calculator
・ Calculator (comics)
・ Calculator (disambiguation)
・ Calculator (Mac OS)
・ Calculator (Windows)
・ Calculator Applications (UIL)
・ Calculator input methods
・ Calculator spelling
・ Calculator watch
・ Calculator-Based Laboratory
・ Calculatrivia


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Calculation in kind : ウィキペディア英語版
Calculation in kind

Calculation Calculation in kind would quantify the utility of an object ''directly'' without recourse to a general unit of calculation. This differs from other proposed methods of socialist calculation, such as simultaneous equations, Taylor-Lange accounting prices, and the use of labor time as a measure of cost.
Calculation in kind was strongly advocated by the positivist philosopher and political economist Otto Neurath in the early 1920s, when much of the discussion about socialism centered on whether economic planning should be based on physical quantities or monetary accounting. Neurath was the most forceful advocate of ''physical planning'' (economic planning using calculation-in-kind) in contrast to market socialist neoclassical economists who advocated use of notional prices computed by solving simultaneous equations. Austrian school critics of socialism, particularly Ludwig von Mises, based his critique of socialism on the calculation problem.〔''Otto Neurath's concepts of socialization and economic calculation and his socialist critics''. Retrieved July 05, 2010: http://www.chaloupek.eu/work/NeurathFin.pdf〕
Proponents of in-kind calculation argue that the use of a common medium like money distorts information about the utility of an object. Socialists in favor of calculation in kind argued that, in a system of in-kind calculation, waste associated with the monetary system would be eliminated, and in particular objects would no longer be desired for functionally useless purposes like resale and speculation - they would only be desired for their use-value.〔''The Alternative to Capitalism''. Retrieved July 05, 2010, from wspus.org "The disappearance of economic value would mean the end of economic calculation in the sense of calculation in units of value whether measured by money or directly in some unit of labour-time. It would mean that there was no longer any common unit of calculation for making decisions regarding the production of goods...Calculation in kind is an essential aspect of the production of goods in any society, including capitalism. A commodity is, as we saw, a good which by virtue of being produced for sale has acquired in addition to its physical use value a socially-determined exchange value. Correspondingly, the process of production under capitalism is both a process of production of exchange values and a process of production of use values, involving two different kinds of calculation. For the former, the unit of calculation is money, but for the latter there is no single unit but a whole series of different units for measuring the quantity and quality of specific goods used in the process of producing other specific goods (tonnes of steel, kilowatt-hours of electricity, person-hours of work and so on). The disappearance of economic or value calculation in socialism would by no means involve the disappearance of all rational calculation, since the calculations in kind connected with producing specific quantities of goods as physical use values would continue."〕
== See also ==


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Calculation in kind」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.